Argent’s Nick Searl talks about the King’s Cross development and ‘uniqueness’ of place
David Taylor speaks to Nick Searl, Joint Managing Partner of Argent about the 67-acre regeneration at King’s Cross for Pipers Model Makers.
David Taylor speaks to Nick Searl, Joint Managing Partner of Argent about the 67-acre regeneration at King’s Cross for Pipers Model Makers.
What was the key to success at King’s Cross?
So many keys. Different people have asked this in different ways. And I’m going to look back to a time before I was even involved. So, we go back to 2001. And I’m going to say, the key to success was the very first year, when significant time was invested in building a shared vision between Argent, between Camden, and as it was then, English Heritage. And writing that down; articulating it in Principles for a Human City.
The temptation, when you get a big project, is to just start drawing it, to start putting squares on the plan where buildings are going to go, and where squares and streets are going to go.
But if you do that, before you’ve really articulated why you are doing this, who it’s for, and what you feel the ultimate end game should be, you are going to go down so many blind alleys with your boxes on your blank piece of paper. Principles for a Human City – the clue is in the name – was all about people. And I think one of the most important things it considered was: how does this new place play a role as a part of London? It didn’t just think of itself as a place inside a red line. And by that I don’t just mean the immediate communities.
There was always an understanding that this had the potential to influence the wider perception of Central London and to be one of those villages, and in some way to alter the perception of the others along the way. To be part of a little matrix of places, and as this new one came in, so everything shifted a little bit in terms of perception.
I think there was an understanding that something of this scale, of this much heritage, in this location, so well connected, could have a profound impact on the wider city. And I think it has. So, for me, the key to its success was properly articulating why and who for, right at the outset. And the people who did that should be lauded. It was Roger (Madelin) and Robert (Evans) and others, who spent their time articulating that really effectively and then getting full buy-in from Camden and English Heritage. So that was a joint ambition.
And yeah, that shared vision was so important, because without it, every time you turned up at Camden with a proposal, what were you pointing at to say why it was doing or bad? Once you have Principles for a Human City you had a frame of reference and so you could move into other documents and more detailed articulations of what the place could be. But having that initial shared vision allowed everybody to coalesce around those ideas and say: does it fit with the principles?
What is your favourite part of the whole site, and why?
I have two favourite parts of the whole site. In some ways the more obvious one is Gasholder Park. I love Gasholder Park because it’s a pause moment. Everything in King’s Cross is about action and activity. And that’s what makes it the place it is. Gasholder Park just makes you stop. And it’s this one little space, where we resisted the temptation to do something. We didn’t put anything in there; there were all sorts of ideas for giant balls and slides, but we resisted the temptation. And we put nothing in there apart from a piece of grass, a bank next to a canal, and it’s a beautifully peaceful, little pause moments in amongst all this stuff that’s going on.
And the other place that I really love is Lower Stables Street, which has just grown and grown and grown in the almost three years now since Coal Drops’ opening. It was the hardest place to articulate what we were trying to do. I don’t think any of us really understood it.
Yet, in my mind, now, even within the context of the whole of King's Cross, it's got a uniqueness, it's got a little spirit of its own down there.
And people just love to gather in that little space. It is intimate, it kind of gets busy, the nature of the retailers you’ve got in there… you’ve never seen any of them anywhere else. It just has a special little unique vibe, all of its own. And it’s another place which is just lovely to just go and sit.
What learning or lesson from the King’s Cross development have you taken on to Brent Cross Town, if any?
The biggest learning is that Brent Cross is not King’s Cross. The King’s Cross development is successful because it’s King’s Cross. And Brent Cross will only be successful if you recognize it’s Brent Cross. We must not try to replicate the King’s Cross regeneration at Brent Cross.
So the learning is all about the uniqueness of place, and looking at what makes that particular place special. And what’s going on with its physical infrastructure, with its connections to its own local communities, for good or for bad. You work with those things; you don’t work with what you wish you had. You work with what you’ve got. And that will underpin its success.
Has the King’s Cross development turned out as you expected?
It’s better. Because you could never be sure that it was right, and you could never be sure that other people would like it as much as you thought you might like what you were doing. The other thing is that the way it has turned out is through hundreds of little accidents, hundreds of little unexpected meetings, and quite a few learnings along the way where you’ve done U-turns, and you’ve learned something.
The magic of these long-term developments is that they’re dynamic. So, as you do one thing, it changes the context for everything else that you are then going to do subsequently. As everything happens, and more people come, and more things are occurring and more partnerships have been created between the actors and characters that are here, you’re constantly changing the context for what you’re going to do with the next bit.
So that’s why the grand masterplans don’t work. Because you can’t possibly know in five years, 10, 15, 20 years what’s going to make sense and what it’s going to feel like. So it’s the ability to have flexible planning permissions that allow you to keep responding, and not just to the immediate change. The only certainty in a 20-year project is that the social environmental and economic contexts in which you deliver will change at least once, if not twice, or three times. And if you then add technology into that…
I always used to tell people a story standing around the King’s Cross development model and saying: we started this in 2001. I would be talking to them in 2018, let's say, so here we are, 18 years later, and we still have about six, seven years to go.
Facebook was started in a garage in February 2004. Look where it is now. Our pace is glacial compared to the rate of change of what is going on around us. So our ability to flex even a little bit is utterly critical. Because otherwise we are just frozen in a moment that is already history by the time we have finished doing what we do. And you can’t be that – it is just a recipe for disaster.
David Taylor
Pipers Model Makers Contributor
Editor, NLQ and New London Weekly
Email: [email protected]